Posts Tagged spanair

Spainair abandons Almería airport

The new Catalan owners of Spainair (SAS had to sell it off due to la crisis to some canny Catalans) have announced that Almería is to be dropped from airports serviced by the airline as part of a cost cutting exercise.

Although Ryanair will be stepping in to fill the gap next month. And, of course, Air Nostrum (motto: safety and comfort are our middle names, right behind “cost cutters”) that all important part of Iberia continues to serve the airport with the same route (and planes?) they’ve been using for the last 20 years.

I suppose that also means they’re out of the bidding for the Almería – Seville route – late last year they were being tipped as “the only contenders”. How things change.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , ,

1 Comment

Spanair crash investigation Judge listens to emergency services hurt

The Judge leading the Spanair crash investigation has called in the 4 National Police agents hurt in the Spainair case in order to evaluate their stories and decide if any honour actions should be taken in their cases.

Their testimony will be taken into account when deciding the outcome of this case – and, if necessary, he will make recommendations for medals or other testimonies.

Meanwhile, he still awaiting the outcome of the politcally influenced main investigation board and his own, independent, review board to find out who is responsable for the accident. Let’s hope he’s got a strong character since the political and economical pressure on the poor chap must be… incredible.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

No Comments

3 charged for homicide and negligence in the Spainair crash case

3 charged for homicide and negligence in the Spainair crash case

After the terrible week in which the Spainair case descended into a farce, the presiding judge investigating the case spent a while getting to grips with the case.

He has now accepted the preliminary report into the crash, which puts forwards as the explanation that after a hasty repair an alarm was disconnected – this alarm would sound if the flaps were not in the correct position for takeoff.

As a direct consequence of this, he has charged three men – the two mechanics who worked on the plane, plus the head of maintenance for the company – with homicide and “imprudent lesions”, dependent upon the final outcome of the investigation.

He has also taken the unusual step of forming a parallel investigation, to comprise of two pilots, two engineers and two mechanics, who will revise the main investigations reports and summarise their own report into the crash. This is believed to be due to the fears of political manipulation I mentioned before. The Judge will personally select the members of this new committee from a shortlist of senior members of the appropriate professions.

More from Google news.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

,

3 Comments

Spanair crash investigation is descending into a farce.

With the announcement yesterday by the Commercial Pilot Association that the investigation is “ruined”, and the attempted resignation of their representatives to the Air Investigation Board, the investigation into the Spanair Madrid -Canary Islands crash has descended into a complete farce.

The sole reason for establishing an Air Accidents Board is to find out the true cause of the accident. Not to proportion blame. That is for the later judicial reports and the Public Prosecutors, if applicable. At this stage they need to work, unmolested by public uninformed gossip, in order to find out why the plane crashed and to make the necessary reports public in order to prevent a repetition of this crash in the future. But this investigation has turned into a back biting, political blame shifting, corporate evasion squabble. Expert scrutiny and peer revised evidence building by professionals has been replaced with the manipulation of the press and public by the concerned parties.

All of the evidence of the crash has been leaked, despite the judicial secrecy laws and promise from the Investigating Judge to punish anyone caught tampering with the evidence. The CPA has made an official complaint saying that the government has made “no effort” to keep the information secret.

The preliminary prereport of the accident – designed to do no more then catalog the timeline of the crash to aid the investigators – has been leaked together with confidential off the record comments by the investigators, and is being presented as the “definitive” report. Do you honestly expect the investigators to make any off the cuff notes, designed perhaps as personal speculation, if they think that they will be presented to the press as their official notes?

One after another, witnesses and experts have been sidelined, fired, resigned or dropped.

The focus of the investigation has been shifted – while technical investigations of the crash go quietly ahead, rampant speculation in the press has already forced the politicians to start publically commenting on the possible causes of the crash, potentially locking their employees into making back covering future statements.

And we’re going to end up with the blame being shifted onto the (potentially) innocent pilots, instead of the (potentially) culpable government air board, the maintenance of the planes, lack of safety training or any one of the potential reasons for why that plane crashed. Which means no unpleasant political comeback. No unpleasant corporate responsibility lawsuits. And no steps taken to ensure such an accident is never repeated.

The investigation of an air crash is a long, costly, patient process. But it is always carried out, in an independent, balanced and peer reviewed manner, in order to find out the true reasons for the crash, and to force any changes in the planes, training or institutions needed to keep us (you, me, them) safe when in the air.

And if the process is allowed to be manipulated in this way we end up with everybody smelling of roses – and more planes potentially allowed to fall out of the sky.

Latest from Spanish news sources about the Spanair Madrid crash (news.google.es)

later Judge Juan Javier Perez of Court 11 of Madrid sent the Guardia Civil to the El Pais newspaper HQ to seize all copies of the video of the crash, which is protected under judicial secrecy until the conclusion of the investigation. El Pais says that the video was sourced from a legitimate source and is protected by the right of the free press under the Constitution, etc. It is interesting to note that Ideal.es illustrates the story of the seizure of the video (here) by putting the banned video in its story. So lets forget about stopping the video getting out, it’s out, and concentrate on who had the most to gain by leaking it.

The PP claim it was the Minister of Development (Fomento), Mrs Maria Dolores de Cospedal, who leaked the video, a claim rejected by the government (and El Pais, who should know) as “unfounded” and “untrue”.

Meanwhile, in light of the leaks, the Air Investigation Board has put back the timeline for the publication of the preliminary report, citing “immense difficulties directly due to the leak”, according to El Diario de Leon. It’s a farce, I tell you.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

,

No Comments

Why the press coverage of the Madrid Disaster shocks us

 The Anglo in Hispanic blogosphere (http://www.notesfromspain.com/2008/08/25/morbo-spanish-news-media-horror/, http://southofwatford.blogspot.com/2008/08/madrid-airport-accidentthe-reactions.html, and other) has been buzzing with suggestions that the Spanish media coverage of the Madrid Air Disaster is because of some unique Spanish trait.

Well, I disagree. I don’t think it’s because of a TV programme in the 90’s, or because of pent up frustration after the Franco years or because of a uniquely Iberian curiosity towards death and destruction.

I think it’s a perfectly normal attempt by the press to cover all angles of an accident that has shocked the nation. I think that you could say that the French, or German, or Italian media would cover it in the same way. It’s a normal coverage of the personal stages of shock, as defined in psychology, and modified by the laws of the nation.

In the beginning, we had the shock. The photos, the 24 hours coverage of the smoke, the survivors.

Then, once the judicial process had begun (remember that Spanish law insists that the process be secret until finalised, this is not unique in this case and is demanded by law) and the photos and stories could no longer by published, we see the natural curiosity of the press unleashed. We see how they, muzzled as they are by Judge David, attempt to approach the story from all angles in order to bring closure to a grieving nation.

We then see the anger phase. The press (and readers) demand satisfaction. Was it Spanair’s fault? The governments? The Air ministry? Who? WHO? WHEN WILL WE HAVE ANSWERS? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

The next step, once the government releases the results of its investigation, will first be skeptical (coming to terms), then finally acceptance, then release. Always assuming no scandal is uncovered along the way.

Of course, in Britain, we are… perhaps inhibited is not the word. Our mentality, our mindset, the whole idea of “stiff upper lip” is still, albeit subconsciously, foremost in our newspapers minds. So when such papers as the Sun release their pent up emotions they do it in a torrent of fury and emotion.

Which is, as a nation, the healthiest outlet? Well, I don’t think the whole concept of “judicial secrecy” helps matters here in Spain. It causes the bottling up of the grieving and curiosity phases, which results in morbid photos, wild accusations, political intrigue and all the rest. Which we, are British, cannot comprehend, but in its own small way helps the public to make sense of the tragic, tragic accident.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

1 Comment

The Madrid air disaster

I was sitting in a busy restaurant when the news broke of the plane crash. As mobile phones started to beep, conversation died out. The music was shut off, a TV was quickly switched on to the breaking news. In the corner, a lady burst into tears and her husband hurried out – no doubt a family member may have been involved.

At the Juan Guerra concert that evening, the roadie who normally belts out “1.2.3″ was allowed to play a small guitar solo in rememberence. And then asked for a minutes silence. People streaming in, chattering, fell silent and found their chairs without making too much noise. All eight thousand of them.

It’s shocked Spain, not least because it’s a national carrier, and was a tourist flight, part of “modern” Spain that allows Spaniards to know that they’ve made it. It’s a blow, an accident that strikes dead into the being of the modern Spaniard.

And I know that our thoughts are with the survivors, and the families of the dead.

But for all that, I have to ask, why does this accident, for all that it is a once off tragedy, seem to have affected Europe more then the estimated 1000 odd illegal immigrants who die annually trying to cross the Med? No doubt the eventual scale of the investigation into this one plane will dwarf the annual budget for finding and stopping the illegal boats.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

,

3 Comments

Back to Top ↑