Posts Tagged junta

Too little, too late

Is this, perchance, a joke on the Junta’s part?

Junta sets up real estate network to sell legal properties to expats

Well, at least they recognise that they’ve destroyed Andalucia as a second home residence by allowing builders to put up lots of shoddy, illegal homes then bugger off scot free. Then knocking the homes down with compensating the expats who have bought them. Which, as you can imagine, has not gone down well with the expats who have warned everyone not to come to Spain.

The solution? Apparantly, instead of legalising the homes already built and punishing the people who put them up, is to gather all the unsold homes and legalise them, before trying to flog them, thus allowing the builders to recoup costs and build more.

People who have already brought in Andalucia can go whistle.

Sooner we get rid of the PSOE the better. Incompetent bunch of “b”ankers. Juan Espadas, our local Housing Honcho, has admitted “there is no solution in sight” for the 6000+ illegal homes in the Almanzora.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , ,

No Comments

Is the PSOE about to snatch the post of Lehendakari from the nationalists?

The País Vasco is the Basque Country, Spain’s answer to Northern Ireland. Rugged, beautiful, with a strange language unconnected to the main patois and a fierce independent spirit.

It recently had an election, along with Galicia. If you want the breakdown on the seats won, click here. Basically, PNV (the main nationalist party that has controlled the regional parliment since democracy) got 30 seats. PSE-PSOE got 24. P.P. got 13. Aralar (another nationalist party) got 4. EA 2. EB 1. UPD 1.

This meant that Juan José Ibarretxe Markuartu, commonly known as Ibarretxe has been the Lehendakari (Regional President – it’s a Basque term) since 1999, and his party (the PNV – Partido Nacionalista Vasco, Basque Nationalist Party) have controlled Parliment since democracy.

The position of Lehendakari is one that is voted by the members of the Regional Parliment, you need a majority of votes to be sworn in. It’s an important and ceremonial position, and the fact that a strong Nationalist has always occupied the post means that the flicker of independence has always lighted the fresh faces of young students and other idealists.

Until now, when ZP and Rajoy (national leaders of the PSOE and P.P. parties, PSOE being the ruling socialist party and PP the conservative opposition) have apparently agreed to an unholy alliance, and will vote together in the Lehendakari elections to appoint PSOE regional leader Patxi López to the post. For the first time ever, it seems as if the Basque Country will have a Madrid stooge at the helm. Unless the nationalists stop squabbling and get together. Which they probably won’t, as UPyD fell out with PNV after the last elections when they were sidelined and have also promised to join the PSOE/PP alliance. Which gives Patxi a majority of votes.

To put this in perspective for the Brits, it would be as if Labour and the Tories formed a coalition government in Scotland with the avowed aim of ousting “The Salmon” from his position, then dissolved the coalition.

There are already frantic shouts of betrayal from among the masses (who, understandably, feel a bit annoyed by this), and personally I take my hat off to old Patxi, who seems to be walking into the lions’ den with his eyes open.

It’s worthing noting that ABC seems to think that President-for-life Chaves of Andalucia, who let’s face it, knows a thing or two about staying in power, has apparently acted as kingmaker and given his blessing to the union. ZP has promised to “assume the fallout” from this.

No word from ETA, the terrorist group, although analysts here at Jackson Central assume that they’re over the moon about this as it will give them fresh ammo in the political war. “Not content with banning any legitimate party that clamours for independence” will run the argument, reminding the voters of the fiasco over the D3M party and others that were banned shortly before the election, “the Madrileño left and right come together to keep us under the jackboot of oppression! To arms, comrades! Euskadi Ta Askatasuna!”

And let’s not forget that a President who has a minority in Parliment, and only got in because of political horseplay with his opposition isn’t going to have a very succesful reign. Makes me wonder what the PP were promised in exchange… I’m sure it’s nothing big. Ahhem. The next few days promise to be interesting…

Oh, and a final point that ocurrs to me: If this gives ETA a boost (frankly, I thought they were all dead), is the first thing they’re going to do is come down to our beaches this summer and let off car bombs as they did a few years ago? Is that why Chaves was consulted?

Grame from South of Watford has some more insightful analysis here.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

1 Comment

Rift between the Junta and Endesa

The Junta de Andalucia and Sevillana Endesa -normally the best of friends, and if you want one then you’ll find them in bed with the other- has display a small rift with Sevillana Endesa over the change from bimonthly to monthly billing.

Those of us on “small” (under 10Kw lines) will have noticed that we are now being billed monthly, instead of every two months, and what is more, the first month is estimated. In some cases, according to complaints, estimated by over 200% more than reality.

This has lead to such an influx of complaints from members of the public that not only has Endesa’s complaint lines collapses, but the Juntas as well; as vast numbers of complaints and queries come in.

This has lead to (shock! gasp! falls against the wall holding his fluttering heart with a moan!) the opening of an informative investigation (expediente informativo) against the company to see if its new policy is “against the public interest”.

Gaspar Zarrias, First VicePresident of the Andalucian Parliment and a man trotted out to the camaras when Pressie for Life Chaves prefers to sit out the crisis in the shadows, has promised a full investigation into the complaints and unprompted (something which has shocked the local media) threated fines and sanctions against the electrical company if it is found to be abusing its power (well, why else have power? asked a bemused Sevillana official [not really]).

“Sevillana Endesa must justify the increase and if there are irregularities, let no citizen have the least doubt that we will ask for the return of payments and impose sanctions” he warned.

Sevillana, apart from the dodgy estimates (which aren’t refunded, only credited if they take too much out of your account) has also convinced the government to allow them to impose a 3,5% increase in the base cost of electricity. January isn’t the best month to do things like this.

For example, the Sevillana Endesa office of Ribera del Genil yesterday had at one point over 300 irate customers demanding attention, apparantly forcing the local police to come round to impose control. Jose Carlos Lopez, a local fella, was indignant as he pointed out that he only earnt 1000€ a month, but was charged 404€ byb Endesa for one months electricity, as opposed to an averge of 50€ a month which was his real usage. “This means my family cannot eat this month” he proclaimed to the press, “but if I refuse to pay it then my family shall be left in the dark”.

FACUA -Federación de Asociaciones de Usuarios y Consumidores, one of Spains principal Consumer Associations- are producing a leaflet informing clients of Endesa of their rights if they believe their estimated bill to be excessive, as the company hasn’t bothered to do this, and are “still deciding what our national response is to be”.

Another client, Jose Aranda, is bitter because it seems that on his bill they have charged him for exceeding his electric charge, despite the fact he never has before.

A statement issued by Sevillana Endesa reminds its customers that it was granted permission to move to bimonthly billing with one estimated by Royal Decree late last year, and that “the company has abided by the rules; we have done nothing wrong”.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , ,

No Comments

Junta to start scheme to start SL companies in 24 hours

The Junta de Andalucia has announced a scheme to get SL companies up and running within 24 hours -as opposed to the normal 35-40 working days it currently takes.

The scheme consists of, believe it or not, some 500 preset up companies, complete with CIF and social capital of 3006€. In theory, all you have to do is ask the Junta for one, roll up to the notary with your 3006€ and sign a Subsanacion to the Escritura which allows you to take over the company and change its social objective.

An amazingly pragmatic way around the byzantine labyrinth that is setting up a limited company in Spain.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

No Comments

Urban Abuse Protest March in Almeria city

Lenox is announcing the organisation of a peaceful and legal demonstration in Almeria city against urban abuse in the countryside.

“Theme: Stop Corruption. Justice Now. Support us. We bought in good faith. Save our homes. Stop planning and real estate abuse. Regularisation now. Justice for the Priors. Transparency and Citizen Participation.

The organisers, residents in the province of Almería, are holding a peaceful protest: (1) against real estate and planning corruption and insecurity and to ask for justice; (2) to ask for solutions and the protection of purchasers in good faith, some of which, are subject to the threat of demolition, and many of which do not have proper water and electricity; (3) to seek transparency and citizen participation in the regularisation process; (4) against proposed charges the Junta seeks to levy within the regularisation process, and which should be met by those responsible, and to ensure this is guaranteed in writing; (5) to ask for justice for the Prior family, victims of so-called ‘planning irregularities’, whose house was demolished a year ago, and who have not yet seen any sign of redress.”

Thank you for the support of the following citizens movements: AVEP, AULAN, AUAN, AUN, LSOS, Ciudadanos Europeos (other contacts at ‘politics’ in links at top of page).

If anybody wants to have a seat on a chartered bus for a nominal charge (Vera, Mojacar, Turre and Los Gallardos pick-ups), get in touch with AULAN secretary ASAP at info@aulan.es or phone 950 069 558.

Read it here.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , , ,

No Comments

Junta spends too much on advertising, complains PP(AL)

Gabriel Amat, leader of the Partido Popular (PP) in Almería, used a press conference in the municipality of Fondón to complain about the vast amount of money being spent by PSOE and President-for-life Chaves on advertising, despite their calls for “austerity”.

It seems that in the 2009 budget, despite a lot of trimming and cutting out of pet projects such as the renovation of the Cable Íngles, a new hospital, new courts for Roquetas del Mar, elimination of level crossings, a cut of 12,9% for the Almeria provincial Employment Agency, etc etc, etc, etc, the advertising budget for the Junta still stands at – wait for it! – €195,000,000.

Leaving aside the fact that government subsideries for RTV-A and other media outlets are not included in that amount. That 195 million euro figure is just for advertising – mainly in the PSOE controlled press & radio, no doubt. Those lovely 5 minute adverts for “Visit Andalucía” on Andalucian TV (anybody ever thought of running those ads outside of Andalucía?) will no doubt continue to run and run.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

1 Comment

NO end in sight for El Algarrobico

After the uproar yesterday about the proposed 100 million euro payment by the Ministry of the Environment to Azata, the owners of El Algarrobico hotel in Carboneras, the Ministry (which, remember, is central government in Madrid, not the Junta de Andalucia, who seems to have washed their hands of the matter) has hastily backtracked.

They have announced the the price of 100 million was set some months ago after an independent firm surveyed the installations and ground (known as a tasación in Spanish), but this survey was for “orientation purposes only”. They further said that the agreement announced yesterday with Azata was simply that they would offer to buy the whole installation to speed everything up, and that Azata agreed to this, but that no price had been set. The Ministry has now ordered a new tasación be carried out, probably mid September, and said that it expects to pay only a fraction of the 100 million previously quoted.

Azata is, understandably, annoyed, and accused the Ministry of simply trying to hide the fact that central government doesn’t have enought cash to pay the previous valuation. It also said that it cannot understand how the Ministry expects a second survey to come to a different conclusion from the first, as nothing has changed and the prices are set by an independent panel of experts. Azata concluded that it hoped that the Ministry would “play by the rules” but that it would not accept a substantially lowered valuation.

Meanwhile, the whole sorry process is still going through the courts, and the Junta de Andalucia says that it will not take a decision until the courts have decided upon the legality of the hotel. However, Manuel Chaves, President apparantly for life of Andalucia, did publically say a while back that the hotel was illegal and will never open, so hopefully his subordinates will be too scared of embarrassing their lord and master to do anything but knock the blasted thing down.

In conclusion, if Azata accepts the Ministrys’ offer, central Government will buy it and knock it down. If they don’t, it’s up to the Junta de Andalucia to keep pressing the matter through the courts until a final, binding decision is made. Which could be a while, the way things are going.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

No Comments

End in sight for El Algarrobico

The Ministry of the Environment and Azata, the promotors of the infamous El Algarrobico hotel in Carboneras (the one built illegally on the beach? Occupied by Greenpeace?) have announced that they have come to an agreement where the Ministry buys the hotel and surrounding installations for, wait for it! – 100 000 000€. One hundred million euros. For building an illegal eyesore on a beach and in a natural park.

“Informed Sources” have already leaked the news that the ministry is expecting this price to triple by the time the hotel has come down and the surrounding area restored to it’s previous glory. That is, as Salvemos Mojacar pointed out, about €10-€12 for every family in Spain.

Salvemos Mojacar, the local pressure group, has already announced its intention to appeal in the courts against this decision, restating its position that the hotel is illegal and should be expropiated without any costs being paid to the promotor.

The Ministry of the Environment, which has not yet officially commented on the decision, seems determined to take the iniciative in the matter, and wants an end to the whole sorry saga. Hence the decision to have the whole project surveyed and the payment of the market cost.

The promotor (Azata) has restated that while they would prefer to finish off the hotel, thus helping stimulate the local economy, the price covers their construction costs and they are willing to accept it. (Probably over the bloody moon). They also restated their position that when the hotel was planned and permission sought, the hotel was legal and it was only after a change in the law that the land the hotel was on was protected, so they have been penalised unfairly. However, almost all of the judicial decisions taken so far contradict this position, and say that construction should never have been allowed to go ahead.

The Junta de Andalucia says it is still awaiting the outcome of the trials in progress and refused to comment on the situation. The Conserjera in charge of the case, one Cinta Castilla, “apparantly trying to avoid the situation” (according to one paper) said she had never been invited to any meeting between Azata and the Ministry. Both of them, however, have complained that Cinta never turned up to any meeting, despite being asked to.

The opposition PP in the Junta said that this position was incomprehensible since President of Andalucia Miguel Chaves had publically stated that the hotel was illegal and would never be opened – so how can the Junta now say they have no power over the final decision?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

No Comments

Junta will spend “hundreds of millions” in Almeria

Aren’t we good little boys and girls, all voting PSOE in the last elections. So we now get “hundreds of millions” spent on us. The Junta de Andalucia, for the first time ever, will hold a Governing Session in Almeria, where they intend to announce a vast quantity of cash will be spent in an orgy of giving over the next few years, above and beyond the normal budget, in order to alliviate the current economic downturn in Andalucia.

101 million euros on agriculture is the only definitive figure available so far (the rest will be announced today after the Junta signs off on the plans). 1.5million on a new Agricultural Investigation Lab in Almeria Uni. 20 million to revamp greenhouses and turn them into long term buildings rather than cheap plastic (Hurrah!). 11 million for “AgroIndustry”. 30 million for watering systems.

But it is also expected that the Junta will lift the death tax on property inheritence between direct family members to 175.000€. Which is nice.

Another 100 million euros is expected to be spent on retraining and rehousing workers, in an attempt to bring people out of the building trade. A “substantial” amount on community integration for municipalities with high numbers of immigrants. 4 million to buy land in Tabernas to start building a “world leading” Technological and Industrial Renewable Energy Hub. 

300 million will be put aside for low cost loans via the ICO for SMEs to expand and diversify.

And, apparantly, “more is to come”. Fine, but from where? Taxes or public borrowing?  

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

No Comments

Back to Top ↑