Posts Tagged illegal builds

Auken to give free conference on property abuse

Margret Auken, the nice MEP who slammed property abuse in Spain, turning her into a god-like figure for AUAN, AUN and similar organisations (many  with almost the same name) is attending a property conference in Alicante at the end of the month.

Free conference on property abuse in Alicante

The conference will cover the basics of “land grablaws, which the EU has ruled illegal, and will also discuss issues such as property rights, planning abuse and coastal law. The issue of what the EU is doing to force Spain to change these laws will also be discussed.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

No Comments

Jail for Cantoria couple who built and sold illegal houses

Well, six months, anyway. For building 15 homes without any license, having them declared illegal by the courts and still selling the bloody things on.

http://www.thereader.es/en/almeria-news-stories/457-jail-for-cantoria-couple-who-built-and-sold-illegal-homes.html

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

2 Comments

Spanish MP to meet citizens with illegal properties

José Antonio Castro, a member of the Parliament of Andalucía and of its Planning and Environment Committee, will meet and listen to representatives of citizens’ groups in Almería affected by planning and real estate abuses. He wishes in future to put questions or a resolution before Parliament.
Date and time: Thursday, 9th July 2009, from 12:00 to 14:00 hours.
Place: Salon de Usos Multiples, Turre, Almería.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

1 Comment

“El Pais” attacks AUAN and illegal home owners in Almanzora

El Pais recently published a rather nasty “special report” on illegal homes built across Andalucia, protest groups formed to protect owners rights and the protest march scheduled for the 9th of January in Almeria and. (Libertad Paloma, from Cadiz, 7/12/08).

They built without permission, they paid a lot less for their homes than for a normal home and they broke the law. But still they ask for more. Around the illegal suburbs built in Andalucia have developed pressure groups to convince the regional administration to ignore their crimes and reduce the costs which they will incur regulating their illegal homes”.

You can read the whole thing in Spanish here.

Here’s a rather bad translation (no time to clear it up, sorry) put through Google Translate:

Built without permits, paid for their houses for much less than one residence, and violated the law. But now demand more. Surrounding neighborhoods illegal encountered in Andalusia under uncontrolled urban development have created pressure groups: neighbors who have joined forces to convince the authorities that overlooked the crimes they committed, and to lower the costs they face by the regularization of their homes. The coordinator of fiscal Environment Andalusia, Angel Nuñez, has its sights on them. Warning about the power of these lobbies whose demands can not or do not want to ignore, the municipal governments.
“We are not illegal.” Neighborhood associations Chiclana (Cadiz), which protect the rights of the owners of the houses for two decades began to be built out of control in this city today there are 15,000, cling to the town planning legislation. “We built without a license, but most homes have more than four years. They are untouchable,” argues Rafael Ortiz, one of his spokesmen.

One of the first meetings of the newly appointed mayor Jose Maria Roman (PSOE) has been with this group and has already announced that it will lower the bylaws written by the previous government, which provided for the payment of between 20 and 36 euros per meter square sewage, supply of light or water.

The pressure comes in other municipalities through the mobilization. The residents of Puerto Chipiona and have common front to denounce the “social impact” generated by the policy of sanctions against illegal constructions and have called a demonstration for 16 days. In Chipiona, with 300 cases of demolition, the mayor, the Socialist Manuel Garcia, came to recognize in a letter to the Government of Andalusia to the demolition could cause a social conflict, “said Pedro Espinosa.

In Port, the City Council (PP) has created a table-sector housing some 500 illegal – within the team that wrote the plan for urban development, which means for ecologists to rely on development of the city of illegal constructions, reports F. J. Román. But these are not the only cases in the province of Cadiz.

In Vejer, the Department of Housing and Spatial Planning will respect the homes of El Palmar, built on land not be developed in exchange for carrying the driver and neighbors not to allow new construction are lifted.

The urbanization illegal Pitas has become a real headache for the government in Córdoba and its neighbors continue to demonstrate and put pressure on the Government of Andalusia and the City of Cordoba for a regularization of their situation, reports M . J. Albert.

Erected in the vicinity of the archaeological site of Medina Azahara, the ground where the urbanization Las Pitas was declared of cultural interest in 2003. This has resulted in the prosecution of six families who performed works since 2006 when the authorities began to take on this.

At trial, the residents have responded with a real pressure campaign, featuring demonstrations on the streets of Cordoba, roadblocks, rallies at the gates of Hearing Córdoba walked up to the archaeological site. Board and City Council have met with neighbors to explain the content of the new decree declaring the expropriation of some land without buildings in Medina Azahara. The owners continue to mobilize Pitas with neighbors of other developments in the area, like Weevil II or Old Córdoba.

The British community living in the Almanzora Valley in the province of Almeria, has joined forces under the collective AUAN (Urbanísticos Abusos Almanzora No) through which they claimed to be carrying out a plan by the administration to legalize the 5,000 homes that are outside of management in the region. The group lived British unease with the demolition of a house in Vera, owned by a foreign family, and called the police operation Costurero charged councilors and the mayor for alleged crimes Zurgena town. The British community has harshly criticized the “late” functioning of Justice against such cases.

The visit of a delegation of European parliamentarians in 2007 who wanted to see in situ the situation faced by British families also had their effect months after the Board tried to resolve the situation. The British even wrote a letter to King Juan Carlos at the monarch explained that the problem of residents, mostly retirees.

It was last September when the Board announced that the houses built on land not be developed in eight municipalities in the Valle del Almanzora, which weighs about urban discipline record or criminal prosecutions and administrative, will have priority in an action plan to give ” solution to the problem. The delegate of Housing, Luis Caparrós, ventured that the initial estimates indicate that only 5% of households would be “outside organization” despite occupying public land or special protection.

El Pais (Spains biggest selling daily) generally toes the PSOE line, as Grupo Prisa is a big mate of PSOE, except when Jose falls out with Z.P. (they always kiss and make up in short order). I think we can see the first indications of what I warned you about before; the politicians are quickly turning this into a “us versus them bloody Brits” issue in the minds of the populace. Read my previous thoughts on why and how this will happen here: Expats to march in protest march against urban abuse in Almeria.
AUAN issued a rather weak response via teleprensa.net (here or translated version). Let me know if you come across anything else.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

7 Comments

Expats to march in protest march against urban abuse in Almeria

As you will know, there is a protest march organised by such AVEP, AULAN, AUAN, AUN, LSOS, Cuidadanos Europeos and others, in Almeria on the 9th of Jan through Almeria city to try to bring media attention back to the Priors case and urban abuse in general. (See programme info at Spanish Shilling or other good websites).

While not wishing to aspirations on the much lauded attempt to bring media attention back to the Priors, I am forced to wonder just how much good a march like this will do, and, indeed, if it is contraproductive in the short to medium term.

This is a march that is designed only to bring EU attention to the case, following on from the recent EU draft parlimentary resolution on Urban Abuse in Spain (blog entry here) and hopefully UK & German press attention.

But from a local perspective, and in my opinion after reading quite a bit about it in local (Spanish) press this is not going to sit well with regional politicians, who, as expats can’t vote in regional or national elections in Spain, don’t give two hoots what they think about anything. But they do care what local Spaniards and national press say. Since the economic downturn has just about killed off the expat property market, the politicians don’t need to worry about bad press back in the UK – promoters are too busy trying to stay afloat to bring any real pressure on the politicians and nobody really thinks that Brits back in the UK are going to be scared off because of a protest march (as they aren’t going anywhere until the pound pops back up).

So we’re in a situation where Brits are marching in the streets of Almeria, and the politicians are only worried about the locals. So, how are the politicians going to try to control the situation and come out smelling of roses?

First of all, and we’re seeing this now, they are trying to turn this into a Expat vs Locals situation. Once the (Spanish) press believe that it is only Expats that are affected, then they’ll stop trying to see the (mainly expat) property owners point of view. And they’re doing this by pointing out that in many cases proper legal protocol wasn’t carried out “in order to save the purchasers money – didn’t trust / didn’t have the money to pay proper lawyers, gestors, notaries that we Spanish do! So why is it our fault they were conned?”

Then they say that “the Brits were fully aware of the situation, but just thought that since they were rich immigrants they could get away with it and stuff the locals, we poor people who pay tax and live legally, so it’s their problem to sort it out”.

And so we end up in a situation where the (Spanish) press, while sympathetic, believe that it’s the purchasers fault for trying to save money on their homes in Spain, avoid the tax they should pay and brought illegal homes without carrying out proper checks because they thought they were invincible.

And don’t start on about rigorous journalistic reports in the impartial media, because that doesn’t exist. Rare is the Spanish newspaper that does not tow the party political line. Editors are easily replaceable if the proprietor doesn’t agree with his papers opinions.

And the politicians can point out, to the rare voice that asks what’s being done, to the commission being setup to survey and regulate illegal homes in the area. “Yes”, they’ll say, smugly, “the Brits are complaining, but it’s because they can’t be bothered to learn Spanish or integrate with our community – we’re sorting the problem out but they can’t even be bothered to ask what we’re doing!”

Why, I’ve even seen comments in the press that suggest that with the collapse of the pound property owners are trying to get their homes ruled illegal so that they can get out of paying the mortgage!

And so we Brits appear, marching through the streets, in a well intentioned, well organised, multi lingual protest – a lovely image that will be quickly swung around in the public mind to “whinging immigrants who tried to con local Spaniards by ignoring rules and refused to pay the same taxes I have to pay!”

And that’s why I feel the march is counterproductive for the local market (ignoring the international media attention it may -or may not- generate, which will help with the EU). But even if the EU brings pressure onto Spain, it will just increase the local sentiment of “Bloody Brits, welcomed them into my country and they’re worse than the bloody Moros“.If we’re not careful.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.50 out of 5

, , , , , ,

4 Comments

Urban Abuse Protest March in Almeria city

Lenox is announcing the organisation of a peaceful and legal demonstration in Almeria city against urban abuse in the countryside.

“Theme: Stop Corruption. Justice Now. Support us. We bought in good faith. Save our homes. Stop planning and real estate abuse. Regularisation now. Justice for the Priors. Transparency and Citizen Participation.

The organisers, residents in the province of Almería, are holding a peaceful protest: (1) against real estate and planning corruption and insecurity and to ask for justice; (2) to ask for solutions and the protection of purchasers in good faith, some of which, are subject to the threat of demolition, and many of which do not have proper water and electricity; (3) to seek transparency and citizen participation in the regularisation process; (4) against proposed charges the Junta seeks to levy within the regularisation process, and which should be met by those responsible, and to ensure this is guaranteed in writing; (5) to ask for justice for the Prior family, victims of so-called ‘planning irregularities’, whose house was demolished a year ago, and who have not yet seen any sign of redress.”

Thank you for the support of the following citizens movements: AVEP, AULAN, AUAN, AUN, LSOS, Ciudadanos Europeos (other contacts at ‘politics’ in links at top of page).

If anybody wants to have a seat on a chartered bus for a nominal charge (Vera, Mojacar, Turre and Los Gallardos pick-ups), get in touch with AULAN secretary ASAP at info@aulan.es or phone 950 069 558.

Read it here.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , , ,

No Comments

Fadesa overvalued its Antas land by 3000%

Martinsa Fadesa, the huge builder that recently went bust owing billions, and the company behind the Ballabona golf course project in Antas (never built, but planned to be part of Llano Central, but we can forget about that now) artifically revalued it’s holdings in Antas and Lucainena de los Torres by 3000%. To be brief, they brought the land for €4,2 million, but put it down as an asset worth €132 million. It was thanks to this, plus the same trick pulled in two fincas in Cadiz, that Fadesa claimed a profit large year, auditors who are going through the bankrupt companys books claim.

Ballabona fince is the large orange grove by the motorway past Antas towards Huercal Overa (look for the petrol station with a large “Ballabona” sign). It was going to be epic, everyone claimed. Currently, I should think the administrators are thanking the gods for the rent the orange farmers are paying.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , , ,

No Comments

No2 in Adra town hall builds an illegal house

The PSOE has revealed that a senior member of the PP, who is also No 2 in Adra town hall, a certain Antonio Piqueras, has built an illegal house of 264 square meters on a bit of land he owns.

It seems that a building license was granted the evening before the PSOE asked about this in open session at an Adra town hall meeting. María del Carmen Crespo, mayoress of Adra (P.P.) is also a member of the Andalucian Parliment and has been mooted as a possible Vice President of P.P. Andalucia.

It seems that on the 28th of March 2007 Antonio Piqueras requested a building license from the town hall. However, the (independent from the town hall) inspector requested some changes be made to the project. Despite this, a “provisional authorisation” was granted. Such provision authorisations are only for temporary constructs, not houses, and in any case was not stamped by the town hall.

Despite -eventually- returning the modified project to the town hall, it was not until 2008 that he designated an arquitect. Not much happened until he discovered that the PSOE was going to table the matter, and the permission -it seems that without going through correct procedures- was granted.

Despite the fact that the house was built in 2007.

Interested people can read the whole accusation here. I can’t be bothered translating all the minutae. The question is:

Will the Junta seek a court order to demolish this illegal house (Priors, anyone?) or will the matter be swept under the carpet?

Feel free to add your commets by using the discussion button below.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, ,

No Comments

Junta opens new Urban Planning office in Turre

An exciting sign has gone up over a previously vacant locale in Turre:

The rather grandoise sign reads:
JUNTA DE ANDALUCIA
Conserjeria de Vivienda y Ordenacion del Terretorio
Oficina Terretorial de  Asesoramiento Urbanistico de Levante

Or in English:
Department for Housing and Territorial Ordination
Territorial Office for Urban Assessment of the Levante

What is it? Can’t find any press releases about it, but I’m assuming it’s the new headquaters for the local Building Gestapo, or the happy little fellows who are charged with ensuring that all buildings are legal.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

,

No Comments

Junta will legalise a large number of urban centres throughout the Almanzora

In the IV Urban Planning conference in Albox yesterday, Luis Caparros, AKA “Mr Demolition Man”, announced that the Juntas’ Planning Department would proceed to legalise “a large number” of illegal “urban centres” that are scattered across the Almanzora.

The Juntas’ definition of “urban centre” is of several houses in close proximity that can be used to justify the reclassification of the surrounding land to urban and the consequent construction of houses next to them. If you remember, this was why the Priors house was demolished, as it was deemed that it together with the neighbouring houses (also under a demolition order, not yet executed) could form the nucleus of a new village.

In brief, this is the expected announcement that the Junta will start legalising lots of nonthreatening homes, which will allow them to have connections to utilities – and, of course, be taxed.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Rating 3.00 out of 5

, , ,

No Comments

Back to Top ↑