Mayor Morales’s controversial change of Cabrera’s ruling committee structure could be over-turned in this Mondays plenary meeting after the PP tabled a motion to annul his decree. And Morales has tabled a motion to annul the 1993 Cabrera decision on voting rights of residents to try to balance things out.
First things first:
Morales had unilaterally decided -against the wishes of his fellow councillors, an apparent majority of owners up there and the recommendations of his civil servants – to take over the running of Cabrera. A full overview of how this land grab worked is in this article of mine. In the process, he has called down the wrath of the public prosecutor into the alleged illegal homes up there and ensured that residents will have to pay thousands for basic services. He’s also plunged Turre council into a multi-million euro sink hole it can ill afford (because it’s bankrupt and can’t even legally hire one member of staff to oversee this new project).
Now the PP has tabled a motion for the council to annul his decision. The motion is a diplomatic and well thought out one that says, in summary, that since Morales’s decision goes against the opinions of his civil servants it is not realistic and bad for the town as a whole. It looks likely to receive cross party support.
(There is still no word from the central government on whether it will allow Turre to embark down this road, so it could all be a moot point anyway if Madrid says niet.)
Can this actually annul Morales’s attempt to install a dictatorship of the proletariat (as this system has been described)? Good question.
Nobody seems to be 100 % sure but the general consensus is that since the decree is still in administrative approval phase, yes it may be that it can be annulled. Once the administrative approval phase has ended then the ultimate decision becomes final, but it hasn’t reached that phase yet.
Even if the councillors vote against this measure only to discover that it can’t be annulled – it could still affect the Madrid decision.
As for the 1993 decree, this involves the original decision on how to setup the system of voting rights and payment responsibilities in the original Junta de Compensación in Cabrera. Morales’s original plan – which he never submitted to vote, he cancelled the vote in favour of unilaterally sweeping away the whole current system in favour of a new one – was to overturn this 1993 decision and install a new system of governance for the old way of running Cabrera. I don’t understand why he’s suddenly resurrected this supposedly moot question (because he’s abolishing this committee) and nor does anyone else I’ve spoken to. Opinions range from it being a move to cover his back legally for some reason to him still trying to establish a change up there if the first PP motion passes.
He’s now finally tabled the decision for plenary approval and councillors will vote on Monday. Again, no suggestion on what would replace this 1993 decision if it is overturned. Councillors look set to keep the status quo, but we’ll know for sure on Monday.
(Later: The Cabrera Residents Association says that: The 1993 agreement would be replaced with the current Statutes that are already in place. Billing would fall into line with current urbanisation laws as quoted in Ley de Ordinacion Urbanisticas de Andalucia (LOUA- refer to para 113.1&2). More explanation from them at the bottom of this page).
It should be an interesting Monday…. There are already Facebook calls for people to show up at the meeting to support one side or the other.
In my personal opinion*:
Morales is currently a government of one, sitting isolated in his ivory tower. Completely out of touch with reality and refusing to discuss anything with his supposed PSOE allies, he has returned to his communist IU roots and openly talks of his desires to install communist IU ideals into his village, instead of dealing with urgent matters such as the budget crisis or crumbling infrastructure. He has decided to split from the only other councillor (the non communist citizen councillor Maria Luisa) on his party ticket in a classic paranoid move of firing your friends. And he is now being guided only by the same small cliche of communists -most of them related to him- that have always controlled the IU party and who attempted to impose a coup on Somos Turre.
He has lost control of the council but continues to sign into law controversial decrees based upon his own whims that nobody supports and will take every opportunity to sink.
He appears to be scrabbling around for a legacy but has managed to make such a mess of things that an enormous lengthy legal confusion for residents and council alone will be what he is remembered for, long after his name has faded from memory.
He came into the council as a bright star promising to guide us into a better future. Now, as his light is slowly extinguished by the cold waters of realpolitik, we see that the brightness was simply caused by him burning up as he abruptly entered the atmosphere of reality, rather than the cold space of abstract political philosophy.